Eric Harold Neville (18891961) was an English mathematician whose main area of expertise was in the field of geometry. He is best known for his book on Jacobian Elliptic Functions and his development of geometrical methods in four dimensions.
He corresponded with D'Arcy Thompson during 1915, two years before On Growth and Form was published. Their letters mainly discuss 3dimensional coordinate systems.
In On Growth and Form, there is a small section at the end of the chapter on Transformations
which mentions the use of 3dimensional coordinate systems.
Thompson deals only with 2D coordinates when discussing coordinate transformations throughout
the chapter as he struggles with the mathematics of 3D coordinates. On the topic of 3 dimensions he says: …this extended theme I have not attempted
to pursue, and it must be left to other times, and to other hands.
D’Arcy uses the simple case of fishes to explain his problem to Neville using the ‘Round’ Haddock and ‘Flat’ Plaice as examples. However, it is less accurate to express the required transformations using only 2D as it is a 3D problem. The main difficulties lie in the position of the eyes and the number of fins.
The transformation is seen through the broadening (increasing along yaxis) and flattening out (z diminishing) of the plaice’s body. Both change relatively to the x direction. Here the breadth and depth vary inversely and this is seen in several other fish examples.
The weightlength coefficient in fishes is given by W=kL^{3}, with constant k practically identical in both
the haddock and plaice. In On Growth and Form Thompson concludes,the extent to which the plaice has broadened is just about
compensated for by the extent to which it has also got flattened or thinned.
Thompson asks Neville for help with his biological problems in terms of 3D coordinates which he is
incapable of tackling
himself. Using the haddockplaice example, he asks Neville if he can illustrate
the flattening process using x,y & z coordinates and enquires what the xz and yz diagrams would show if flattened
according to respective xy diagrams.
From this, it is clear that D’Arcy consulted with Neville on this topic but there is little evidence to show how much Neville influenced D’Arcy’s thinking on 3D coordinates. The section at the end of the book lacks detail on how 3D transformations work and instead highlight Thompson's lack of understanding.
Introduction

Overview & D'Arcy's Life

On Growth and Form

Heilmann & Shufeldt

Maths of Transformations

Correspondence

D'Arcy and Mathematics

Coordinate Transformations

Logarithmic Spirals

Forms of Cells

Forms and Mechanical efficiency



The support of The Strathmartine Trust towards this website is gratefully acknowledged
Alice Gowenlock & Indre Tuminauskaite © June 2018 Copyright information  School of Mathematics and Statistics
University of St Andrews, Scotland 
The URL of this page is:
http://www.mcs.stand.ac.uk/~dat/